EN/IT

A dedicated engineering team that owns the software your business runs on

A WWG engineering retainer is a twelve-month-minimum engagement in which a dedicated engineering team — a stable senior team with a named owner, not a rotating bench — keeps running your critical production software: monitoring it, fixing what breaks, paying down risk before it becomes next year's crisis.

Not extra hands. One team, permanently accountable for the system that keeps your business running.

Definition

What is an engineering retainer

What brings a company to a retainer is rarely a single outage: it is knowing the next one is coming and having nobody who owns the system between crises. An engineering retainer is the standing arrangement that closes that gap, and a WWG engineering retainer runs for a minimum of twelve months with one dedicated engineering team — a stable senior team with a named owner, not a rotating bench — running the critical production software day to day: monitoring it, fixing what breaks, and paying down the risk that would otherwise become next year’s emergency. The client gets continuity, written monthly reporting and one accountable owner for the system the business runs on, rather than extra hands to manage. It begins with a conversation with a WWG founder about what needs continuous ownership.

Recognition

When you need a dedicated team

01

The last fix worked, but you know the next one is coming, and you don’t want to start from zero with a new vendor each time.

02

Your in-house team ships features, but nobody owns uptime, incidents and technical debt as their actual job.

03

You’ve cycled through freelancers and agencies. Each one learned the system, then left with the knowledge.

04

“Good enough” fixes are quietly becoming next year’s crisis.

05

Leadership wants one accountable team, not a ticket queue split across vendors.

If you're tired of re-explaining your system to someone new every few months, this is what we do instead.

Deliverable

What the retainer covers

Continuous ownership

Monitoring, incident response and maintenance for the systems that matter, not a shared help desk.

Continuity with a named owner

Continuity is the product: an owner who does not change and context that does not get lost. Nobody re-learns your system every quarter.

A running improvement roadmap

Technical debt paid down deliberately, not left to accumulate.

Monthly written reporting

What changed, what’s at risk, what’s next. Leadership never has to ask.

Direct escalation to a founder

Not a support ticket, when something urgent happens.

A clear exit path

Not a lock-in with vague terms.

Continuity is the product. The same context and an owner who does not change, month after month.

Process

How the retainer works

01

A conversation with a founder

You describe what’s under continuous risk. If a retainer is the wrong instrument, we say so.
02

We arrive within a week

Onboarding starts fast, not after months of procurement.
03

First 30 days: a full system walkthrough

We learn what matters before we touch anything.
04

Ongoing: a monthly cadence

Maintenance, incident response and roadmap review, with a founder in the loop on anything material.
05

Twelve-month checkpoint

Renew, adjust scope, or wind down. Terms are set upfront, not renegotiated under pressure.

The engagement

The retainer in concrete terms

Duration
Twelve months minimum, with a checkpoint at the end: renew, adjust scope or wind down, on terms set upfront.
Start
Within a week of agreeing scope. The first thirty days are a full system walkthrough, before we touch anything.
Who does the work
A stable senior team with a named owner and a founder in the loop on anything material.
What it includes
Monitoring, incident response, maintenance, a running improvement roadmap, written monthly reporting, direct escalation to a founder.
What we need from you
An agreed perimeter, access to systems and environments, an internal point of contact. Your team keeps doing its job.
Format
A fixed monthly fee for twelve months, scope defined upfront, a clear exit path. No lock-in with vague terms.

The fee is set in the scoping conversation according to the perimeter and does not change during the year. We do not sell hours and we do not publish a price list: the retainer exists to make the spend predictable.

Comparison

Retainer, fractional CTO or an in-house team

Anyone searching for “fractional CTO” or “dedicated engineering team” is almost always comparing four different ways of having someone answer for the software. Here is what each includes and when it makes sense.

CriterioWWG engineering retainerFractional CTOCTO or in-house teamProject agency or staff augmentation
What you getTechnical leadership plus a senior team that runs the system: monitoring, incidents, maintenance, an improvement roadmap.Part-time technical leadership: decisions, roadmap, team governance.Hired people, with everything that comes with them: recruiting, onboarding, retention.People or a project for a limited time: they deliver and leave.
Who answers for the systemA named WWG owner, with direct escalation to a founder.The fractional CTO for decisions; execution stays with your team.You, entirely.Nobody, once the project closes.
ContinuityContext that does not get lost: documentation, runbooks, a stable point of contact.Depends on the person; if they leave, the knowledge goes with them.High as long as the people stay.Low: every new vendor re-learns the system.
HorizonTwelve months minimum, with a checkpoint and a clear exit.Often month to month.Open-ended.The length of the project.
How it is paidA fixed monthly fee, agreed upfront for the year.Day rate or monthly fee.Salaries and overhead.Hourly, daily or fixed price.
When it makes senseA critical system nobody owns as their job, and the will to solve that for more than a quarter.You need direction, not execution; the in-house team already runs the system.Software is the core business and justifies a department.You need extra capacity on a defined project, with an in-house team that takes it over afterwards.

If what you need is senior people inside a team you already have, the right service is team augmentation, not the retainer.

Related services

A retainer, or a fixed-term engagement

If the state of the system is still an open question, start with a software audit of the production system. If it is already failing, it needs software project rescue and stabilization first, and the retainer comes after that.

And if what you actually need is senior people inside a team you already have, that is a different service: development team augmentation.

Proof

Track record

Continuity in practice

Continuity is the whole premise of a retainer. The proof point that belongs here is a client we've run for years, not one we fixed once.

Published case studies

The team

Who is on the dedicated team

WWG is the team companies call when critical production software is under pressure and the in-house team plus the usual suspects cannot stabilize it.

Twenty-six years of track record. International senior engineers. On retainer, it's a stable team with a named owner month over month, not a rotating bench.

Often the team that ran your audit or stabilization, continuing the work under one roof.

The WWG dedicated engineering team that runs production software on retainer

FAQ

Questions leadership asks us

One senior team, permanently accountable for uptime, incidents and technical debt on the system that matters most. Not a rotating bench, not a single advisor. Some call this a fractional CTO or fractional engineering team: ours is the full team behind that title.
A fractional CTO is an external technology executive who gives a company part of their time: architecture and roadmap decisions, leading the team, answering to the board. A WWG engineering retainer includes that leadership function but adds the hands: a senior team that actually runs the system, makes the fixes, keeps the monitoring and answers for incidents. If you only need direction, a fractional CTO is enough; if you need someone to carry the system, you need the retainer.
What a hired CTO would do, without the cost of a full-time position: set technical direction, assess the team and the vendors, decide what gets built and what does not, explain technology risk to leadership. On a WWG retainer a founder carries that function, which is what the market calls CTO as a service, in the loop on anything material, while senior engineers look after the system every day.
Most of our retainer clients do. We’re not replacing your team: we own one specific system or risk area, uptime, incidents, compliance-critical code, that nobody currently owns as their actual job. Scope is agreed upfront, no overlap.
No. If you have a CTO, the retainer works under their direction and takes off their desk the system that currently eats their nights: uptime, incidents, technical debt. If you do not, a WWG founder carries that function for the agreed perimeter. Either way the decisions stay yours; the retainer answers for how they get executed.
A fixed monthly fee, agreed for twelve months, that depends on the perimeter: which systems, what coverage, what response obligations. The fee is set in the scoping conversation and does not change during the year. We do not sell hours and we do not publish a price list: the retainer exists to make the spend predictable, not to meter time.
A shorter engagement barely covers onboarding before it ends. Twelve months is long enough for us to know your system as well as you do, short enough that we still have to earn the renewal.
The retainer has a named owner who does not change, and everything we know about your system lives in written documentation and runbooks, not in one person’s head. If an engineer rotates, whoever comes in is paired before touching anything and the owner stays the same. That is the continuity we promise: a stable point of contact and context that does not get lost, not a list of names.
Depends on the system. If it’s fundamentally sound, we start directly on retainer, within a week of agreeing scope. If it’s actively failing, we stabilize it first, then move to retainer once it’s holding steady.
Companies whose production software is critical enough that no one being permanently accountable for it is itself a risk. If that’s your situation, the size and shape of your team matters less than getting it solved.

Tell Us What's Broken

Mohamed Deramchi

Mohamed Deramchi

Founder & CEO of WWG

20+ years in IT leadership, product, and cloud consulting. Leads delivery strategy and senior technical direction.

AddressCorso Europa 15, 20122 Milano (IT)

Send Your Brief

By submitting you agree to our privacy policy.

Coesione Italia 21-27 Lombardia - Cofinanziato dall'Unione europea - Regione Lombardia