EN/IT

A senior software audit for production systems under pressure

The Audit is a two to four week engineering review of your production software. Senior engineers examine the architecture, the code, the delivery process and the team. You get a written report that says what is at risk, what it takes to fix, and in what order.

Clarity before you commit to a rebuild, an acquisition, or another year of patching.

Recognition

When companies call us

01

Every release breaks something new, and nobody can explain why.

02

You inherited a system nobody fully understands. The people who built it are gone.

03

Your board, your bank or your acquirer is asking hard questions about the software your revenue depends on. You do not have defensible answers.

04

The team says everything is fine. Delivery keeps slipping anyway.

05

You are about to sign off on an expensive rebuild and want an independent second opinion first.

If one of these sounds like your Tuesday, keep reading.

Deliverable

What you get

One written report, in language leadership can act on:

Architecture and code

What is solid, what is fragile, where the next failure starts.

Security and compliance posture

Real exposure, not a checklist.

Delivery process

Why releases hurt.

Team assessment

Can the current team carry the system forward, and with what support.

A prioritized risk map

Every finding ranked by business impact, with effort estimates.

One clear recommendation

Fix, rebuild, or run. With the reasoning on paper.

The report is yours. What you do with it is your decision.

Process

How it works

01

A conversation with a founder

You describe what is under pressure. If an audit is the wrong instrument, we say so.
02

We arrive within a week

Access, code, first interviews. No months of onboarding.
03

Weeks one to three

Senior engineers read the code, trace the incident history, interview the team, test the assumptions everyone stopped questioning.
04

Final week

Written report plus a working session with leadership. We defend every conclusion.
05

You decide what happens next

The Audit stands alone. No obligation to continue with us.

Not sure an audit fits your situation? Write to us, describe the system, and you get a direct answer from a founder within one business day.

Proof

Track record

Luxury & Fashion

An Italian luxury group brought us in to examine critical production software. The methodology on this page took that engagement from first call to strategic engineering partnership in two months. We audit the way operators audit: to find what breaks, not to produce a binder.

Financial Services

A mid-market financial services company asked us to audit a payments platform after three consecutive failed releases. Within two weeks we identified a coupling problem in the transaction pipeline that their team had been patching around for over a year. The fix was structural, not heroic.

Manufacturing & IoT

A European manufacturer running mission-critical IoT infrastructure needed clarity before a board decision on rebuilding vs. extending. Our audit mapped 14 interdependent services, identified the three that carried all the risk, and gave leadership a sequenced plan they could defend to investors.

Healthcare

A digital health platform under regulatory pressure engaged us to assess security posture and delivery process. We delivered a compliance-grade report in three weeks that satisfied their auditor and gave engineering a concrete remediation roadmap prioritized by patient safety impact.

E-Commerce

An international e-commerce group inherited a platform through acquisition. Nobody on the current team had built it. We reverse-engineered the architecture, documented the critical paths, and gave the CTO the confidence to make a build-vs-buy decision backed by evidence rather than opinion.

The team

Who runs it

WWG is the team European mid-market companies call when critical production software is under pressure and the in-house team plus the usual suspects cannot stabilize it.

Twenty-six years of track record. International senior engineers who ship under conditions most teams cannot imagine.

The people who audit your system are the people who would fix it.

WWG team

FAQ

Questions leadership asks us

An independent technical review of your production system, covering architecture, code, security posture, delivery process and team. Output is one written report: what’s at risk, what it costs to fix, in what order.
Technical due diligence usually serves an acquirer. Our audit more often serves the owner—a CEO, CFO or board that needs the true state of software they already depend on. Same rigor, different beneficiary. We support M&A situations when asked.
No disruption. We need access, a few hours of interviews and a contact person—your team keeps working. We start within a week of agreeing scope; the full engagement runs two to four weeks.
You get the report and a working session, then decide: fix it yourselves, rebuild with whoever you choose, or continue with us. Standalone engagement, not a foot in the door.
Companies whose production software is critical enough that a bad week becomes a boardroom conversation. If that’s your situation, revenue size matters less than getting an honest answer fast.

Tell Us What's Broken

Mohamed Deramchi

Mohamed Deramchi

Founder & CEO of WWG

20+ years in IT leadership, product, and cloud consulting. Leads delivery strategy and senior technical direction.

Send Your Brief

By submitting you agree to our privacy policy.

Coesione Italia 21-27 Lombardia - Cofinanziato dall'Unione europea - Regione Lombardia