Code Guardian
Source Code Audit
A source code audit is the narrow reading of a software audit: senior WWG engineers read the code, dependencies and tests of your production system and tell you, with evidence, what is maintainable, what is fragile and where to start. It is for CTOs and technical teams who already know the architecture and want an independent view of the code alone. You get a written report with technical debt, vulnerabilities and a backlog ranked by impact.
Definition
What is a software audit
A software audit is an independent technical review of a codebase and the system around it, run to establish what is at risk, what it would cost to fix, and in what order. The review covers architecture, code quality, security posture and the delivery process, and it ends in a written report rather than in code changes.
our advantages
How Code Guardian Works
Audit
In-depth review of code, architecture, and workflows to identify technical debt and inefficiencies.
Recommendations
A personalized action plan focusing on initiatives that deliver maximum business impact.
DIY
Use the provided plan to implement changes in-house.
Professional Support
Our team will help execute the solutions with minimal disruption to your business.
60 %
reduces development
costs and time
70 %
of companies face technical debt,
often due to architectural flaws
30 %
improves documentation
and processes
specializations
How It Helps Your Business
Cost Savings
Identify inefficiencies to lower maintenance and development expenses.
Enhanced Performance
Boost speed, reliability, and scalability to improve user satisfaction.
Faster Development Cycles
Streamline processes for quicker updates and feature rollouts.
Improved Documentation
Establish clear development standards and onboarding practices.
Informed Decisions
Make strategic changes confidently with expert-backed insights.
our advantages
Why WWG is the Best Choice for Code Guardian
AI Accuracy
AI Accuracy
Business-Oriented
Business-Oriented
Deep Expertise
Deep Expertise
Comprehensive Documentation
Comprehensive Documentation
platforms
Technologies We Support
cases
Customer Success Stories
Some concrete examples of the use of our technologies and how our knowledge has been useful to solve critical situations or improve workflows.
What Our Clients Are Saying
WWG successfully delivered a project document and software that fully met RAG requirements. WWG's project management was efficient — they delivered everything on time. Moreover, they showcased clear communication and strong technical capabilities, which were key to the project's success.
Francesco Adinolfi
R&D, Innovaway SpA
WWG provided custom software development services for an ICT company. The team designed and developed an innovative ICT software system capable of supporting RAG services.
The engagement
The source code audit in concrete terms
- Duration
- Set in scoping, according to the perimeter: repositories, codebase size, languages, presence of tests.
- Start
- After the perimeter is agreed and read access is in place. No long onboarding.
- Who does the work
- Senior WWG engineers, with a named owner accountable for the engagement through to delivery.
- What you provide
- Read access to repositories and environments, a few hours of interviews, one contact person. Your team keeps working.
- Output
- A written report with every finding ranked by impact and effort estimate, a prioritised backlog and a hand-over session.
- Format
- Standalone, fixed-scope engagement. You can implement in-house or ask for professional support with execution.
The price is set before we start, in the scoping conversation, based on the perimeter to be read. We do not publish a price list: two codebases of the same size can need very different readings.
Comparison
A source code audit and the alternatives
When the code of a production system starts costing too much, four options with different purposes land on the table. This table says what each one is for, so the choice is made on the question you need answered.
| Criterio | WWG source code audit | Full software audit | Internal code review | Static analysis tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who it is for | CTOs, tech leads and technical teams who want an independent view of the code alone. | CEOs, CFOs, boards and CTOs who have to decide on the whole system. | The team that wrote the code and already knows it. | Development teams that want continuous automated checks. |
| What it covers | Source code, dependencies, tests, code-level vulnerabilities. | Code, architecture, security and compliance, delivery process, team, incident history. | Changes in progress, one at a time. | Known patterns and configured rules; not the business context. |
| Duration | Set in scoping, according to the perimeter. | Set in scoping, usually longer than a code-only audit. | Continuous, inside the development cycle. | In continuous use, with initial setup effort. |
| What you get | A report with findings ranked by impact, effort estimates and a prioritised backlog. | A report with one recommendation on the whole system: fix, rebuild or run. | Comments on individual changes; no overall picture. | Lists of warnings, often long and without business priority. |
| When it makes sense | Before a refactoring, after a change of vendor, when every release costs more than planned. | When the question is what is at risk across the whole system and in what order to act. | Always, but it does not replace an outside look at accumulated code. | As a baseline, not a replacement: we use the tools too, but engineers do the reading. |
If you are looking for a program to manage internal audits and inspections, this is not the right page. This page is about the engineering review of a production system’s source code.
Published case studies
- Neotecnica: code audit and security hardening
More than 13,000 issues identified, over 19 vulnerabilities fixed and a high-availability Kubernetes cluster delivered on the back of the findings.
FAQ
Related services
When reading the code is not enough
A code audit looks at the source. Where the question is regulatory exposure instead, it belongs to compliance and security auditing; where it is about the technologies themselves, to technology stack analysis. Whatever the audit surfaces is then carried into software risk management.
Tell Us What's Broken
