EN/IT
Technology Stack Analysis

Technology Stack Analysis

A WWG tech stack assessment is a structured review of the technologies your production system is built on: languages, frameworks, databases, infrastructure and third-party services. Senior engineers evaluate how well each component still fits its job, what it costs to keep and where it holds the business back. It is for CTOs and leadership teams who have to decide what to keep, what to replace and in what order, with a written and reasoned action plan.

Definition

What is a tech stack assessment

A tech stack assessment is a structured review of the technologies a company builds on: the languages, frameworks, databases, infrastructure and third-party services in use, how well each still fits its job, and what it costs to keep. The output is a written view of what to keep, what to replace and in what order, with the reasoning attached.

our advantages

Benefits for Your Business

01

AI Precision

Tailored, environment-specific recommendations.

02

Business-focused

Balanced, cost-effective solutions.

03

Proven Expertise

Backed by 20+ years of experience in software security.

04

Clear Roadmaps

Actionable plans for sustainable security improvements.

30 %

Up to faster development
cycles

40 %

Reduction in human error
risks through automation

25 %

Infrastructure cost
savings

4.9

clutch rating

process

How It Works

01

Discovery

Analyze your current technology stack and business goals.
02

Evaluation

Identify gaps, inefficiencies, and opportunities for improvement.
03

Recommendations

Present a tailored action plan to optimize your stack.
04

Implementation

Support the integration of recommended tools and technologies.
05

Monitoring

Ensure long-term success through continuous evaluation and updates.

our advantages

Why Choose Us?

Comprehensive Expertise

Skilled in evaluating and optimizing diverse technology ecosystems.

Customized Solutions

Strategies tailored to your unique business requirements.

Proven Track Record

Success stories across multiple industries.

Ongoing<br>Support

Dedicated assistance throughout the optimization journey.

cases

Customer Success Stories

Some concrete examples of the use of our technologies and how our knowledge has been useful to solve critical situations or improve workflows.

reviews

What Our Clients Are Saying

Clutch rating
"WWG's competencies in technical and management aspects were impressive."

WWG successfully delivered a project document and software that fully met RAG requirements. WWG's project management was efficient — they delivered everything on time. Moreover, they showcased clear communication and strong technical capabilities, which were key to the project's success.

Francesco Adinolfi

R&D, Innovaway SpA

Custom Software Development

WWG provided custom software development services for an ICT company. The team designed and developed an innovative ICT software system capable of supporting RAG services.

Paese
Naples, Italy

The engagement

The tech stack assessment in concrete terms

Duration
Set in scoping, according to the perimeter: systems and environments, components and integrated services, documentation available.
Start
After the perimeter is agreed and read access is in place. Work starts with discovery of the business goals.
Who does the work
Senior WWG engineers, with a named owner accountable for the engagement through to delivery.
What you provide
Read access to code and infrastructure, the list of services and licences, a few hours of interviews, one contact person.
Output
A written view of what to keep, what to replace and in what order, with reasoning, plus an action plan and a hand-over session.
Format
Standalone, fixed-scope engagement. Implementation support and periodic monitoring available separately.

The price is set before we start, in the scoping conversation, based on the perimeter to be examined. We do not publish a price list. Implementation support is quoted separately on the basis of the action plan.

Comparison

A tech stack assessment and the alternatives

When a system’s stack starts holding the business back, there are usually four routes on the table. This table says what each one is for, so the choice is made on the question you need answered rather than on the label.

CriterioWWG tech stack assessmentFull software auditInternal CTO reviewAutomated tech stack detector
Who it is forCTOs and leadership teams who have to decide what to keep and what to replace.CEOs, CFOs, boards and CTOs who have to decide on the whole system, code included.Companies whose CTO has enough time and distance from the system.Anyone who wants a quick list of the visible technologies on a website.
What it coversLanguages, frameworks, databases, infrastructure, delivery, third-party services, licences and costs.Architecture, code, security, delivery process, team, incident history.What the CTO knows; rarely what was inherited.Only technologies detectable from outside; nothing on databases, infrastructure or process.
DurationSet in scoping, according to the perimeter.Set in scoping, usually longer.Depends on the time the CTO can take away from operations.Instant.
What you getA view of what to keep and what to replace, in what order, with reasoning and an action plan.A report on what is at risk across the system and one recommendation: fix, rebuild or run.An internal opinion, authoritative but not independent.A list of technology names, with no judgement and no priority.
When it makes senseBefore a migration or modernisation, or when maintenance costs grow without a clear reason.When the question concerns the whole system, not only the technologies chosen.When a quick first survey is needed before involving outsiders.Out of curiosity about a competitor’s site, not to decide investments.

If the question also includes code quality and the release process, the right page is the software audit, which includes the stack analysis as one of its areas.

Published case studies

FAQ

A tech stack is the set of technologies a company’s systems are built on and run with: programming languages, frameworks, databases, cloud or on-premise infrastructure, delivery tooling and integrated third-party services. A typical example for a web product is a JavaScript front end, a Java or Python back end, a relational database, a cloud provider for hosting, and a payment and email service on the side. No stack is neutral: every choice determines who you can hire, what each change costs and how far the system scales.
A tech stack assessment is a structured review of the technologies in use in a production system, run by engineers outside the team that built it. For each component three things are evaluated: whether it still fits the job it does, what it costs to keep in terms of skills, licences and infrastructure, and what risk it carries in terms of obsolescence, vendor support and security. The output is a written view of what to keep, what to replace and in what order, with the reasoning attached.
Searching for tech stack assessment returns three different things. Technical assessments for developer candidates, which are hiring tests and have nothing to do with this page. Marketing or sales stack audits, which inventory the SaaS tools a team pays for. And the tech stack assessment as an engineering service: senior engineers examining every technology a production system runs on, including the parts no external tool can see, and telling you what to keep and what to change. This page is about the third.
A tech stack assessment covers the whole technical perimeter of a production system: application languages and frameworks, databases and data handling, infrastructure and hosting, the delivery pipeline, third-party services and libraries, licences and recurring costs. For each layer we identify gaps, inefficiencies and opportunities, and relate them to the business goals collected in the discovery phase. The action plan you receive ranks interventions by impact, not by technical interest.
You determine whether a tech stack is still the right one by testing each component against three criteria: fitness for the current load and features, not the ones it was chosen for; total cost of ownership, including the skills needed to run it and how easy they are to find; and obsolescence risk, meaning vendor support, security updates and end-of-life dependencies. A component that fails two of the three goes into the replacement plan; one that fails one goes on watch with a review date.
The duration of a tech stack assessment is set in scoping, according to the perimeter: the number of systems and environments, the number of components and integrated services, and the documentation available. Once the perimeter is fixed, we fix the duration and the price before we start, as a fixed-scope engagement. We do not publish a price list, because two systems with the same number of users can have very different stacks to read. Implementation support, if requested, is quoted separately on the basis of the action plan.
Senior WWG engineers run the tech stack assessment, with a named owner who is accountable for the engagement through to delivery. From you we need read access to code, infrastructure and configuration, the list of services and licences in use, a few hours of interviews with the people who operate the system and the people who set its business goals, and one contact person. Your team keeps working as usual.
After the tech stack assessment you receive the written action plan and a hand-over session in which we defend every recommendation. Then you decide: carry out the changes with your own team, hand them to another vendor, or ask WWG to support the integration of the recommended technologies and to run periodic monitoring so the stack stays fit over time. The assessment is a standalone engagement and does not commit you to continuing with us.
A tech stack assessment is for CTOs, CEOs and leadership teams of companies with a production system that is a few years old: when every new feature costs more than the last, when people who know the technologies in use are hard to find, when infrastructure and licence costs grow without a clear reason, or before a cloud migration or a modernisation project. If the question is what to keep and what to change, and in what order, this is the right review.

Related services

What follows the analysis

Stack analysis sits next to reading the source in a code audit. Its conclusions lead to one of two routes: optimizing the existing systems or migrating to microservices.

Tell Us What's Broken

Mohamed Deramchi

Mohamed Deramchi

Founder & CEO of WWG

20+ years in IT leadership, product, and cloud consulting. Leads delivery strategy and senior technical direction.

AddressCorso Europa 15, 20122 Milano (IT)

Send Your Brief

By submitting you agree to our privacy policy.

Coesione Italia 21-27 Lombardia - Cofinanziato dall'Unione europea - Regione Lombardia